References

References [Armstrong 02] Armstrong, J.; Barbour, R.; Hefner, R. and Kitson, D. Standard CMMISM Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPISM): Improvements and Integration. Systems Engineering 5, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1926. [Averill 93] Averill, E.; Byrnes, P.; Dedolph, M.; Maphis, J.; Mead, W. and Puranik, R. Software Capability Evaluation (SCE) Version 1.5 Method Description. (CMU/SEI-93-TR-017), Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1993. [Bamford 93] Bamford, R. C.; Diebler, W. J. Comparing, Contrasting ISO 9001 and the SEI Capability Maturity Model. IEEE Computer, October 1993. [Besselman 92] Besselman, Joe. A Collection of Software Capability Evaluation Findings: Many Lessons Learned. Presented at NSIA, March 1992. [Boyett 98] Boyett, Joseph H. and Boyett, Jimmie T. The Guru GuideThe Best Ideas of the Top Management Thinkers. Boyett & Associates, 1998. [Bush 02] Bush, Marilyn. "Applying the S/W CMM and the CMMI: Unlocking the Hidden Logic of Process Improvement." SEPG 2002. February 2002. [Byrnes 96] Byrnes, Paul and Phillips, Mike. Software Capability Evaluation Version 3.0 Method Description (CMU/SEI-96-TR-002). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996. [Caputo 98] Caputo, Kim. CMM Implementation Guide: Choreographing Software Process Improvement. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1998. [Cheung 03] Cheung, Sally. "Transforming Appraisal Findings into a Process Improvement Plan." SEPG 2003. February 2003. [Chrissis 03] Chrissis, Mary Beth; Konrad, Mike; Shrum, Sandy. CMMIGuidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2003. [CMMI Product Team 02] CMMI Product Team. CMMI for Systems Engineering/Software Engineering/Integrated Product and Process Development/Supplier Sourcing, Version 1.1 Staged Representation (CMU/SEI-2002-TR-012, ESC-TR-2002-012). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, March 2002. [CMMI Product Team 01] CMMI Product Team. Appraisal Requirements for CMMISM, Version 1.1 (ARC, V1.1), (CMU/SEI-2001-TR-034). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2001. [CMMI Product Team 00] CMMI Product Team. SCAMPISM, V1.0, Standard CMMISM Appraisal Method for Process Improvement: Method Description. Version 1.0. (CMU/SEI-2000-TR-009). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2000. [Crosby 79] Crosby, Philip B. Quality Is FreeThe Art of Making Quality Certain. McGraw-Hill, 1979. [Deming 82] Deming, W. E. Out of Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, 1982. [Dunaway 01a] Dunaway, Donna K. and Baker, Michele. Analysis of CMM®-Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI) Assessment Feedback. (CMU/SEI-2001-TR-021). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2001. [Dunaway 01b] Dunaway, Donna K. and Masters, Steve. CMM®-Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI) Version 1.2 Method Description. (CMU/SEI-2001-TR-033). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2001. [Dunaway 01c] Dunaway, Donna K. CMM®-Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI) Lead Assessor's Guide V1.2. (CMU/SEI-2001-HB-002). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2001. The Lead Assessor's Guide was not made available to the public. It was distributed to registrants in the SEI's offerings of CBA Lead Assessor Training. Because this training course is no longer provided at the SEI, some of the instructive parts of the Guide have been included in this book with appropriate citations. [Dunaway 99] Dunaway, Donna K.; Berggren, Ruth; des Rochettes, Gilles; Iredale, Paul; Lavi, Itzhak. Why Do Organizations Have Assessments? Do They Pay Off? (CMU/SEI-99-TR-012). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, July 1999. [Dunaway 96a] Dunaway, Donna K. and Masters, Steve. CMM-Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI): Method Description. (CMU/SEI-96-TR-007). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996. [Dunaway 96b] Dunaway, Donna K. CMM®-Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI) Lead Assessor's Guide V1.1. (CMU/SEI-96-HB-001). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996. [Eickelman 03] Eickelman, Nancy. An Insider's View of CMM Level 5. IEEE Software, Vol 20, No 4, pp. 7981, July/Aug 2003. [GEIA 01] EIA, EPIC, and INCOSE, EIA/IS 731-2, Systems Engineering Capability Model Appraisal Method, GEIA (Government Electronics and Information Technology Association). Washington, DC: 2001. [Gremba 97] Gremba, Jennifer, and Myers, Chuck. The IDEALSM Model: A Practical Guide for Improvement. Bridge, Issue Three. Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1997. [Hammer 96] Hammer, Michael. Beyond ReengineeringHow the Process-Centered Organization Is Changing Our Work and Our Lives. Harper Business, a division of Harper Collins Publishers, 1996. [Hayes 04] Hayes, Will; Miluk, Gene; Ming, Lisa; Glover, Margaret; and Members of the SCAMPI B & C Project. Handbook for Conducting SCAMPI B and SCAMPI C Appraisals. SEI Draft Document for Community Review, August 2004. [Humphrey 02] Humphrey, Watts S. Getting Executive Support. Proceedings, SEPG 2002. Phoenix, Arizona, February 2002. [Humphrey 92] Humphrey, Watts S. Introduction to Software Process Improvement (CMU/SEI-92-TR-007), Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1992. [Humphrey 89] Humphrey, Watts S. Managing the Software Process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1989. [Humphrey 87] Humphrey, W. and Sweet, W. A Method for Assessing the Software Capability of Contractors (CMU/SEI-87-TR-23). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1987. [ISO 87] International Organization for Standardization, Quality management and quality assurance standardsGuidelines for Selection and Use ISO 9000, Geneva, 1987. [Juran 88] Juran, J. M. and Gryna, F. M. Juran's Quality Control Handbook, 4th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988. [Kanter 02] Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. "Leadership in Turbulent Times: Coping with Change in Business, Technology, Communities and the World." Willis M. Tate Distinguished Lecture Series, Southern Methodist University, November 2002. [Kanter 01] Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. eVolve! Succeeding in the Digital Culture of Tomorrow. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2001. [Kasse 02] Kasse, T. Action Focused Assessment for Software Process Improvement. Cambridge, MA: Artech House, 2002. [Kitson 01] Kitson, David, et al. Document presented at SCAMPI Lead Appraiser Upgrade Training. March 16, 2001. [Kotter 96] Kotter, John P. Leading Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996. [Krasner 98] Krasner, Herb. "Using the Cost of Quality Approach for Software," Crosstalk. November 1998. [Kuvaja 94] Kuvaja, P.; Simila, J.; Krzanik, L.; Bicego, A.; Koch, G.; Saukkonen, S. Software Process Assessment and Improvement: The Bootstrap Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Business, 1994. [Masters 95] Masters, Steve and Bothwell, Carol. CMM Appraisal Framework, Version 1.0 (CMU/SEI-95-TR-001). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1995. [Members of the AMIT 01] Members of the Assessment Method Integrated Team. Standard CMMISM Appraisal Method for Process improvement (SCAMPISM), Version 1.1: Method Definition Document. (CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2001. [Olson 89] Olson, T. G.; Humphrey, Watts; Kitson, D. H. Conducting SEI-Assisted Software Process Assessments. (CMU/SEI 89-TR-7). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1989. [O' Toole 03] O'Toole, Patrick. Do's and Don'ts Article 13, "Lead by Example." Personal Communication to the Author: 27 April 2003. [O'Toole 02] O'Toole, Patrick. Do's and Don'ts Article 10, "Do Ask Different Questions." Personal Communication to the Author: 12 February 2002. [Paulk 94] Paulk, Mark; Weber, Charles V.; Curtis, Bill; Chrissis, Mary Beth. The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1994. [Paulk 93a] Paulk, Mark; Weber, C.; Garcia, C.; Chrissis, M.; Bush, M. The Capability Maturity Model for Software Version 1.1. (CMU/SEI-93-TR-024). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1993. [Paulk 93b] Paulk, Mark; Weber, C.; Garcia, C.; Chrissis, M.; Bush, M. Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1. (CMU/SEI-93-TR-25). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1993. [Rifkin 03] Rifkin, Stan. "Why New Processes Are Not Adopted." Advances in Computer. Marvin Zelkowitz, editor, vol. 59, 2003. [SEI 01] SEI Agreement, License Agreement Between CMU SEI and {transition partner company name} for the CMMI Product Suite, Candidate Lead Appraiser Selection Criteria. [SEI 03] SEI, Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement: Team Training: Module F Assigning Assessment Ratings, from SEI SCAMPI Kit, 2003. [SEMA 03] Software Engineering Measurement & Analysis Group. Process Maturity Profile of the Software Community. April 2003. www.sei.cmu.edu/sema. Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2003. [SPICE 95] SPICE: Baseline Practices and Process Assessment Guide, Version 1.01, January 1995. [Vu 00] Vu, John Du V.; Griffin, Scott. Process Improvement Journey (From Level 1 to Level 5). Keynote Address, SEPG 2000 Conference. Seattle, Washington, March 2000. [Waina 02] Waina, Richard. Capability Maturity Model Benefits. Multi-Dimensional Maturity, Celina, Texas, http://www.mdmaturity.com/reference.html, 2002. [Wiegers 2000] Wiegers, Karl E.; Sturzenberger, Doris C. "A Modular Software Process Mini-Assessment Method." IEEE Software. January/February 2000. [Zubrow 03] Zubrow, Dave. CMMI Appraisal Results, SEPG 2003. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, February 25, 2003. [Zubrow 94] Zubrow, Dave; Hayes, Will; Seigel, Jane; Goldenson, Dennis. Maturity Questionnaire (CMU/SEI-94-SR-7). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, June 1994.